Of soulwandering and of life after death

 I have wondered why things go ashtray in the world. It seems that some have thought death better than continuing life and so they have taken death and killing as goals, but somehow humans and other beings still exist, and so there seems to be life after death for many, and I guess that it is in many cases dimilar to the lives before dwath, even maybe in the same world, or the same kibds of things affecting, I guess often like some choice or period having been removed and life just continues lije before, and so it woukd matter to not to make things worse. 

One reason for thibgs getting worse is some saying that they kniw so and so much of the civiluced school taught thibgs, and maybe trying to get animals keep up such a picture in the air. But that makes such feel compulsory and so much more difficult to vear, and so many jydt try to destroy such, and so thibgs jyst go ashtray instead of jyst there being some info of who kniws what, understands how much, has which skilks, values, goals, ways of communicating, trustworthiness and areas of comfortability. 

Things being used to quite the oppisite goals than what was the idea in them when trying to arrange lives well, wisely, with wisdom of lufe and all free. That would in the spiritual sense look like those beings woukd belong to another kibd of lufe where such choices go mire naturally right. And it sounds tgat one ought belong to a species like oneself, instead of vased on some other persons' features, quality, etc. Like for example standing on two feet resembles how a moyse rises to two feet to take a look at the wider environment. So humans woukd be naturally awafe of the landscape around and luve in harmony as such. If someone does not bear this and that kn the sphere of attention without going to take a clider look at once and maybe also attacking, such soubds like preferring lufe on the four feet. And one who does not go anywhere as if in a landscape, maybe would be worm like or very small comoared with others. 

Of the possibility of growing wings by sheltering the small scale by earlier learned much wider civiluced wisdom or something like tgat, suggests that maybe such transformatiobs would be possible for some but woukd demand having such a feature all the time instead of jyst as a momentary imoression. A tail maybe connects with staying in comoany even when going further away. Bodily size seems to connect with the ease of the environment to vear such, like a nicely behavibg person without making strong claims or even forcing even a luttle, coukd maybe be a giant, but an individual trying to arrange the thibgs of others "see, you would do this tvis way and this that way, and so there would be..." if it us ok at all, would mean others preferring havkng tgat person short, or otherwise easy to neglect fully. 

* 

At least many pets and rats seem to have a landscape like view at least part of the time, kind of taking part in life in the landscape and in the wide picture of the world. So it seems that if some individuals of them would be suited to human jobs, for example governing, they maybe could do them well, for example human relations and concentration per subject, but that requires safety i.e. is it large enough size, good communication, good picture of the world, life experience and especially recognizing who is like what.